A comparative analysis of the legal, institutional, and judicial factors that lead parties and counsel to select international arbitration seats — examining London, Singapore, Paris, and emerging venues. Supervised by Professor Franco Ferrari, one of the world's leading scholars of conflicts of law and international arbitration.

A published comment in one of the leading student-edited international law journals in the United States, examining the tension between contractual freedom and public policy constraints in Indian PIL as illuminated by a significant Supreme Court decision.

An analysis of the tension between India's renewable energy ambitions and its WTO obligations — examining the DS456 solar cell dispute and its implications for the design of climate-compatible trade policy. Supervised by Professor Robert Howse, one of the world's foremost WTO scholars.

A practitioner-focused piece examining the persistent jurisdictional conflicts that arise when domestic courts are asked to restrain foreign arbitral proceedings — with reference to Indian court practice and comparative analysis.

An analysis of how Indian courts have interpreted and evolved their powers under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act in appointing arbitrators — examining the shift from a largely supervisory to a more interventionist judicial approach and its implications for arbitral efficacy in India.

An examination of marine insurance liability frameworks for oil pollution events — analysing India's domestic regulatory architecture against its international treaty obligations under MARPOL and the Civil Liability Convention.